150 International Affairs:Eliminate the Export-Import Bank
-
2016200
-
2017200
-
2018200
-
2019200
-
2020200
-
2021200
-
2022200
-
2023200
-
2024200
-
2025200
-
2016-20201000
-
2016-20252000
Sources
According to testimony from the CBO, fair-value accounting results in an estimated savings, from eliminating the Export-Import Bank, of $2 billion over 10 years. Estimates provided on page 6 of congressional testimony “Testimony on Estimates of the Cost of the Credit Programs of the Export–Import Bank,” June 25, 2014.
×Technical Notes on Scoring
CBO Baseline
Unless otherwise noted, calculations for savings for each recommendation relies on the most recent Congressional Budget Office baseline, as found in “An Update to the Budget and Economic Outlook: 2014 to 2024,” published August 27, 2014, has been used.
Savings “Totals”
While totals for the five and 10 year savings are provided by section and for the complete set of recommendations, there are two reasons they should not be viewed as representing total savings for The Budget Book.
First, as noted in the introduction, The Heritage Foundation would recommend that the savings realized in the Function 050 Defense section would stay within the Department of Defense to strengthen the nation’s defense capabilities.
Second, the numbers cannot be deemed to represent the realized savings if every single recommendation were adopted because policy changes made in one program can impact spending levels in other programs. Thus, the numbers in the table do not reflect any potential interactions between the various policy changes affecting spending or savings.
×Heritage Recommendation:
Allow the Export-Import Bank (Ex-Im) to expire when its current authorization lapses on June 30, 2015. This proposal saves $2 billion over 10 years under fair-value accounting that prevails in the private sector. CBO Director Douglas Elmendorf testified to the appropriateness of fair-value accounting when relaying the costs of the Export-Import Bank, stating, “In CBO’s view, therefore, fair-value estimates provide a more comprehensive measure of the costs of federal credit programs, and CBO has provided fair-value estimates for many programs to help lawmakers more fully understand the trade-offs between certain policies.”1 Compared to the Congressional Budget Office’s (CBO’s) baseline, which per the 1990 Federal Credit Reform Act does not properly consider risk of default, this proposal would technically cost the federal government $14.4 billion over 10 years.
Rationale:
Contributing Expert
Diane Katz, who has analyzed and written on public policy issues for more than two decades, is a research fellow in regulatory policy at The Heritage Foundation.
Diane KatzResearch Fellow in Regulatory Policy
Heritage Expert
James L. Gattuso handles regulatory and telecommunications issues for The Heritage Foundation as a Senior Research Fellow in its Roe Institute for Economic Policy Studies.
James L. GattusoSenior Research Fellow in Regulatory Policy
Additional Reading
- Diane Katz, “The Export-Import Bank: A Government Outfit Mired in Mismanagement,” Heritage Foundation Issue Brief No. 4208, April 29, 2014,.
- Diane Katz, “Export-Import Bank: Cronyism Threatens American Jobs,” Heritage Foundation Issue Brief No. 4231, June 2, 2014.
- The Heritage Foundation, “Facts About the Export-Import Bank,” Factsheet No. 149, July 28, 2014.